A Core Outcome Set for the Benefits and Adverse Events of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: The BARIACT Project
General Information
Abstract:
Background
Bariatric and metabolic surgery is used as a treatment for patients with severe and complex obesity. However, there is a need to improve outcome selection and reporting in bariatric surgery trials. A Core Outcome Set (COS), an agreed minimum set of outcomes reported in all studies of a specific condition, may achieve this. Here, we present the development of a COS for BARIAtric and metabolic surgery Clinical Trials—the BARIACT Study.
Methods and Findings
Outcomes identified from systematic reviews and patient interviews informed a questionnaire survey. Patients and health professionals were surveyed three times and asked to rate the importance of each item on a 1–9 scale. Delphi methods provided anonymised feedback to participants. Items not meeting predefined criteria were discarded between rounds. Remaining items were discussed at consensus meetings, held separately with patients and professionals, where the COS was agreed. Data sources identified 2,990 outcomes, which were used to develop a 130-item questionnaire. Round 1 response rates were moderate but subsequently improved to above 75% for other rounds. After rounds 2 and 3, 81 and 14 items were discarded, respectively, leaving 35 items for discussion at consensus meetings. The final COS included nine items: “weight,” “diabetes status,” “cardiovascular risk,” “overall quality of life (QOL),” “mortality,” “technical complications of the specific operation,” “any re-operation/re-intervention,” “dysphagia/regurgitation,” and “micronutrient status.” The main limitation of this study was that it was based in the United Kingdom only.
Conclusions
The COS is recommended to be used as a minimum in all trials of bariatric and metabolic surgery. Adoption of the COS will improve data synthesis and the value of research data. Future work will establish methods for the measurement of the outcomes in the COS.
Bariatric and metabolic surgery is used as a treatment for patients with severe and complex obesity. However, there is a need to improve outcome selection and reporting in bariatric surgery trials. A Core Outcome Set (COS), an agreed minimum set of outcomes reported in all studies of a specific condition, may achieve this. Here, we present the development of a COS for BARIAtric and metabolic surgery Clinical Trials—the BARIACT Study.
Methods and Findings
Outcomes identified from systematic reviews and patient interviews informed a questionnaire survey. Patients and health professionals were surveyed three times and asked to rate the importance of each item on a 1–9 scale. Delphi methods provided anonymised feedback to participants. Items not meeting predefined criteria were discarded between rounds. Remaining items were discussed at consensus meetings, held separately with patients and professionals, where the COS was agreed. Data sources identified 2,990 outcomes, which were used to develop a 130-item questionnaire. Round 1 response rates were moderate but subsequently improved to above 75% for other rounds. After rounds 2 and 3, 81 and 14 items were discarded, respectively, leaving 35 items for discussion at consensus meetings. The final COS included nine items: “weight,” “diabetes status,” “cardiovascular risk,” “overall quality of life (QOL),” “mortality,” “technical complications of the specific operation,” “any re-operation/re-intervention,” “dysphagia/regurgitation,” and “micronutrient status.” The main limitation of this study was that it was based in the United Kingdom only.
Conclusions
The COS is recommended to be used as a minimum in all trials of bariatric and metabolic surgery. Adoption of the COS will improve data synthesis and the value of research data. Future work will establish methods for the measurement of the outcomes in the COS.
Aim:
The development of a COS for BARIAtric and metabolic surgery Clinical Trials
Authors:
Karen D. Coulman ,
James Hopkins,
Sara T. Brookes,
Katy Chalmers,
Barry Main,
Amanda Owen-Smith,
Robert C. Andrews,
James Byrne,
Jenny L. Donovan,
Graziella Mazza,
Barnaby C. Reeves,
Chris A. Rogers,
Janice L. Thompson,
Richard Welbourn,
Sarah Wordsworth,
Jane M. Blazeby,
BARIACT working group
James Hopkins,
Sara T. Brookes,
Katy Chalmers,
Barry Main,
Amanda Owen-Smith,
Robert C. Andrews,
James Byrne,
Jenny L. Donovan,
Graziella Mazza,
Barnaby C. Reeves,
Chris A. Rogers,
Janice L. Thompson,
Richard Welbourn,
Sarah Wordsworth,
Jane M. Blazeby,
BARIACT working group
Publication
Journal:
PLOS Medicine
Volume:
Issue:
Pages:
-
Year:
2016
DOI:
Further Study Information
Date:
Funding source(s):
Health Area
Disease Category
Endocrine & metabolic
Disease Name
Obesity
Target Population
Age Range
18 - 110
Sex
Either
Nature / type of Intervention
Surgery
Method(s)
Consensus meeting
Delphi process
Interview
Survey
Systematic review
Stakeholders Involved
Clinical experts
Consumers (patients)
Study Type
COS for clinical trials or clinical research
COS for practice
Patient perspectives
Systematic review of outcomes measured in trials
Systematic review of qualitative research
Related studies
- A Comparison of Health Professionals’ and Patients’ Views of the Importance of Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery
- The patient perspective of bariatric surgery outcomes: Developing a 'core' set of patient-reported outcomes
- Outcome reporting in bariatric surgery: an in-depth analysis to inform the development of a core outcome set, the BARIACT Study
- The patient perspective of outcomes of bariatric surgery: The need for a ’core’ set of patient-reported outcomes.
- Patient-reported outcomes in bariatric surgery: a systematic review of standards of reporting
- The patient perspective of living with surgery for morbid obesity: Creating a patient 'core' outcome set, and investigating ways to improve follow-up care.
- Development of a core outcome set for bariatric surgery